Friday, April 23, 2010
Game 5 - What was that?!?!?!?
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
NHL Playoffs!!!
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Sad or Happy?!?!
I don’t know whether to be happy or sad about the Avalanche losing last night. I’m sad because they just can’t seem to get anything going. After a 5-1 win against a good Blackhawk team, I thought they would bring that momentum into last night’s game. In the end, they didn’t even score one goal. I thought they played a pretty good game, hit the post a few times but just couldn’t find a way to put anything in the net. But….. I’m happy because with every lost this teams gets at this point will only make their chances at a good draft pick better. Everybody is talking about Tavares going #1, but from what I’ve read, the draft pool this year will be pretty good. So even if the Avs don’t get the #1 pick, anything within the top 5 would be fine. Although I know that the Avs won’t go out there and lose on purpose because I doubt any professional athlete wants to do that, a winning streak right now would only make things worse for next season. So if the Avs can get something going in the last 15 games of the season, good for them, if they can’t and finish in the bottom of the standings, good for next year.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Fighting in the NHL
This is a proposed new rule to curtail fighting in the NHL. This is sounds like an odd rule because isn't it a penalty to fight during a break in play? That is why the fighters wait for the drop of the puck, right? Apparently the refs will be granted a great deal of latitude in determining if a fight is staged. Allowing more subjectivity for the refs creates a situation like the piss-poor NFL where wildly inconsistent calls are common place, even with the help of review and often enrages fans. Justifiably so!
The subjectivity of the NFL is part of what makes it so bad. The NHL has by far the best reffing in the 4 majors as well as the best instant replay review. This will be a step in the wrong direction.
I agree that staged fights suck, that was one reason I wasn't too sad to see the Sheriff leave town. He rarely seemed to have his heart in a fight, a lot of tap dancing and not a lot of slugging.
Besides, if you keep eliminating fights between 'fighters' you are going to have "fights" like Liles' and Drury's recent pansy-fights, how is that fun?
Hmmm, Drury's fight from a week or two ago was SO lame, I can't even find a video of it. Did you know he won a Little League BB World Series? Yea, me neither.
Here is a recent fight between Wade Belak & Donald Brashear. I've always wished that the Avs had hung on to Belak, more exciting fighter than the Sheriff. Watch this fight, trust me, it's good. And it doesn't take long!
Now was that a staged fight? It started at the drop of the puck, that seems to be the criteria for the new rule. Staged or not, that last punch to Brashear was anything but staged. I don't like this proposed rule. Right now the refs have the discretion of breaking up fights, and they often do for a variety of reasons. If a couple guys aren't really into the fight and are just wrestling around, it often gets broken up, the boys sit in the sin bin, done. No need for 10 minute misconducts. That is just stupid.
Posted by: From the Point
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Marketing Hockey to Old Fans & New
True story: I took a woman to an Avs game once and the first thing she asked me about was the fighting. She was of the opinion that fighting is bad. Just my luck a fight broke out and she was up on her feet before the gloves hit the ice. It was a decent fight and once it was over she rather sheepishly sat down and admitted that was pretty exciting.
I have met, by far, many more women fans of hockey that actually understand the game than any other sport. A lot of women watch football, but they know hockey.
Some people seem to be picking up on this. The Wash Caps launched a site recently called ScarletCaps.com. The page proclaims that it is the "...official Web site dedicated to the Caps' female fanbase". While I think the marketing dept has the concept right, a few things went wrong along the way. First of all, the name. Scarlet? Really? I kinda thought I was being a pig because the first thing I thought of was...um...well, the once a month, female-centric occurrence. And the second was a book called the Scarlet Letter, not a particularly flattering club membership. But my girlfriend agreed, just an unfortunate choice for the name. Next, the page looks like a romance novel. Don't women like hockey 'cause it is rough and tough?
Ok, well at least they are trying. They have a couple resident bloggers and I think the best thing that they have done is this hockey camp for women. Sounds like they get a chance to go out on the ice and learn first hand from Caps players and coaches about the game.
The Denver Broncos have offered the same sort of event for a couple years now, I don't recall the exact price but I'm pretty sure it was over $100. I think that is a bit steep. I don't know what if anything the Caps charged for this event. If you are a season ticket holder, shouldn't it be gratis?
I few more comments about marketing. The Avs have sent out their renewals and I have to say, from what I have heard, they are making a very poor choice in how they are approaching the loss of ticket holders with this recent plan. From what I hear and what has been in the news, the Avs are offering upper level patrons a couple of seats on the lower level for the killer price of < $25. But you have to purchase your uppers as well. So if you were considering cutting back on your entertainment dollar, why in the world would you spend yet another $2,000 (for 2 seats)???
Isn't that like buying something you have no use for just because it is 50% off regular price? We all know that doesn't make sense, right? In addition, this devalues the lower bowl seats to the patrons that are paying full price to sit in the attack twice corner, or where ever. I don't think the Avs have made a very savvy marketing decision. And I don't know why they think all their fans are so stupid.
The Wild are considering selling a new seat location in the box between the benches, normally occupied by photographers. Now that sounds like a good idea. And even better if they sell them in say, 2 & 5 game packages so that a lot of different people get a shot at sitting there.
Posted by: From the Point
State of the Avs

Smyth played like he has been playing for weeks now, like the guy that is the new leader in the club house. Obviously I have no idea what goes on in the locker room but it seems as though Smyth is taking this team on as his own. I know that a lot of people think that Stastny is the default choice as the captain when Super Joe decided to hang 'em up, but I'm not so sure.
Why not make Captain Canada, Captain Colorado? Sure, there are a lot of very young captains in the league, mostly on very young teams that are going through a rebuilding, or were when the captain was named; the Kings, Chicago and of course Crosby.
But perhaps Stastny could learn a thing or two from Captain Canada? Give him time to grow into it. Besides, who is leading this team on the ice? Smyth. Ah, don't cry Smitty! Really, those are tears of joy, Captain? Me? I'm so flattered! Well you should be, this team has only had one captain, the next one should not be chosen without careful consideration.
Posted by: From the Point
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Lappy Gives Cancer Patient Birthday Gift
Thanks Lappy.
Watch the video
Visit Tristan's Blog
Posted by: From the Point
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Dater Watch
The story begins to deteriorate as Dater posts that Avalanche PR man Jean Martineau is unaware of any such retirement announcement.
This is followed within the hour by another post announcing a false alarm.
This is followed by the two posts being deleted off the Post's website. That tends to crank some people off and since I managed to capture the posts I thought I would throw them up here.
I would assume that said source will no longer be considered reliable.
Forsberg to retire tonight in Denver?
Today, March 04, 2009, 7 hours ago Adrian Dater

Just learned from a reliable source that Peter Forsberg, along with his parents, are in Denver right now and that Forsberg will “make an announcement” at the Avs-Wings game tonight.
That announcement is expected to be that he will officially retire from the NHL.
I’ll have more on this as it develops. I talked to Forsberg’s agent, Don Baizley, about this just now and he didn’t want to offer a comment of any kind.
This would be the kind of appropriate game to make such an announcement, no?
*Avalanche PR man Jean Martineau just told me that he is “unaware” of anything in place for Forsberg tonight at the game, and did not even know whether he is in town or not.So, this is why I put the question mark at the end of the blog header. But I’ve talked to people who say they have eyewitnesses of seeing Foppa’s parents last night at a hotel, and that they are saying Peter will make an announcement of some kind.We’ll see if this happens or not, but as now the Avs are claiming ignorance.
No Foppa retirement tonight Today, March 04, 2009, 7 hours ago Adrian Dater Sorry for the false alarm folks. No Forsberg retirement announcement here tonight. While a retirement is likely to be official at some point soon, it won’t be tonight at the Avs-Wings game. Comments
Posted by: From the Point
Avs will beat the Red Wings Tonight
Simple statistics!
Avs unlikely to lose six in a row.
Wings have lost all of their back to back road games this season.
And I won't be at the game to curse them.
UPDATE: I'm a bit worried now due to the score, 3-1 and the fact that the Avs traded Leopold this morning, the Wings Killer this season.
Final: Wings, 3-2. So much for stats! Avs lose 6 in a row, first time this season. Wings win second of back to back road games, first time this season.
Avs have never swept the Wings in a season series.
So much for a perfect season.
Posted by: From the Point
Monday, March 2, 2009
Altitude's One on One with Ian Laperriere
This road trip has been brutal for Avs fans. What could possibly cheer me up? I know! Tune into catch Lappy, One on One! Should be good!Saturday, February 28, 2009
Avs Host Second Charity Event of the Season
The rest of the team decided to take pity on the Rangers and hand them their first win under the new coach. Not to mention the charitable contribution to the Chris Drury isn't a Bust Fund. The guy breaks a 17 game drought against his former team, which might have meant something to him, if his former team had bothered to show up. They didn't.
The Altitude guys were originally told that Lappy's late game 2:00 penalty was for abuse of officials. If you saw Lappy's face tonight...well I think you know it was 2:00 for ugly mug.
Tonight, the Avs couldn't even win a fight.
On the bright side, the Wings were beaten by Nashville, 8-0, and that's an even worse beating than Lappy's face.
Posted by: From the Point






