data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/348ae/348aeb5273ad2821182860bdfd6144a018e6b384" alt=""
The real inspiration for posting the "Dater Watch" is an "incident" that began one year ago, today. And yes, it is still bothering me, I'm holding a grudge. I've got a chip on my shoulder, I'm feeling the resentment. Got it? Good.
I thought I had a pretty smart idea for hockey broadcasts. Why don't the intermission interviews ever involve a goalie? So I emailed my question to Dater's mailbag at the Denver Post. Dater did answer it, on Mar 27th, 2008.
Basically Dater tells me it probably will never happen. Ok, fine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ba55/2ba5555b1675ca2307c7687211652d182954c03c" alt=""
Look at #3...hmmm...that sounds pretty familiar, interviewing goalies between periods.
I decide I wouldn't jump to any conclusions, lots of people have probably thought of this before. But the timing was bothering me a little. And the fact that Dater replied to my question with a pretty definitive negative. Then he suggests the same thing.
So I emailed him and asked him about it. Frankly I don't have the emails anymore. But I do have a distinct recollection of the content in general.
I didn't accuse him of stealing my idea. I even gave him an out to say he had thought of it before the mailbag. Instead of taking the out I offered, he simply said "those are the breaks, kid" like we were in some 1930's movie. Said something about how he would throw some credit my way in a future blog post. So he didn't deny it, and I never did see that nod in a post.
So, I've got my eye on you Dater.
Posted by: From the Point
No comments:
Post a Comment